Title: Message
Hi Nick, John, Eric, Fritz, Kevin, Dan,
NCL Admin, et al:
>> This
change removes our ability to override ROUTETO in special
circumstances. <<
I recommend you sit tight just a little longer.
The "new" behavior apparently was not intended and I'm certain, Declude will be
made "downward" compatible.
It may help to check your configurations to whether you
can company specific (= per domain) actions. If you
are using either of these two
features:
-
\Domain.com\$default$.junkmail
-
REDIRECT @domain.com
then
this may explain the (unexpected/temporarily) changed handling of DELETE, HOLD
and other actions. Again, I believe this will be
corrected.
Best
Regards
Andy Schmidt
![]() H&M Systems Software,
Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue,
Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
John Tolmachoff (Lists)
wrote:
I have not been following the thread in detail, but if some one that is
having the problem would change to WEIGHTRANGE instead of WEIGHT and ensure
there are no overlappings, I have a feeling the at least part of the
"problem" might be resolved.
No, this isn't an appropriate
solution. The change makes ROUTETO the final action, and now it
has precedence over DELETE. If you have a filter called
BLACKLIST-NO-MATTER-WHAT set to DELETE, and a message fails that test plus it
fails something that has a ROUTETO action, it will not be deleted. This
change removes our ability to override ROUTETO in special circumstances.
While most issues will be fixed by preventing the overlapping of weight ranges
and the actions, that only applies to weight based things, and this ties our
hands when it comes to taking actions regardless of weight. That's
completely unacceptable, and I also assume that it was unintentional; the
result of an oversight.
If DELETE is to be changed in the way that they
did, they must make it be able to target a recipient that has already been
tagged with ROUTETO. It makes no sense to use the changed ROUTETO
address for determining further actions. This will also be very
difficult to troubleshoot in some circumstances and also difficult to keep
track of.
Declude needs to make sure that the actions are not applied
based on the ROUTETO address' config, but instead the original recipient's
config. If they did that, all problems would be solved, including the
overlapping weight range issue that seemingly has stung so many
here.
Matt
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
|
<<attachment: HMSoftSmall.jpg>>
