Hi,
the following header
failed the "SPAMROUTING" test.
Received: from
ms001msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.51] by hm-software.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A17B1AA600C4; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:38:35 -0500
Received: from fisso (5.9.180.73) by ms001msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3)
id 4235CA070004004B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:38:34 +0100
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A17B1AA600C4; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:38:35 -0500
Received: from fisso (5.9.180.73) by ms001msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3)
id 4235CA070004004B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:38:34 +0100
It was
identified correctly by Declude as the following "country"
chain:
[IANA
Reserved]->ITALY->destination
While the ISP in
Italy is using inappropriate IP addresses for their internal network, I feel
that any occurrence of "[IANA Reserved]" clearly indicates an
"internal" network - and internal routing should not be questioned by
Declude.
If we look only at
the mail routing once the mail entered the public network (the Internet), then
the route:
ITALY->destination
should not have
triggered SPAMROUTING?
Best
Regards
Andy SchmidtH&M Systems Software,
Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue,
Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-----Original Message-----
Received: from ms001msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.51] by hm-software.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A17B1AA600C4; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:38:35 -0500
Received: from fisso (5.9.180.73) by ms001msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3)
id 4235CA070004004B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:38:34 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Franco Lombardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3501/4501
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:45:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
<<attachment: HMSoftSmall.jpg>>
