On 31 Mar 2005 at 11:21, John Shacklett wrote: I fully agree. Especially on the 'insider' part. Declude grew as it did in a large part because of the input from this list - I for one have - as Declude is doing - kept my ideas to myself.
-Nick > Once upon a time, not so terribly long ago, there were Declude > versions. Declude versions came in "release" and "beta", and a user > could run one or the other based on best practices decisions by that > local user. It was unique in my [albeit limited] experiences, and it > got betas groomed and features disseminated fast fast fast. > > It appears we have come full circle to a situation where selected > insiders are testing betas, and the rest of the forum sees more > infrequent releases. I recognize that as an obvious and common model, > and I can't find specific fault with the approach.... > > ...except to note that it is one more aspect of the conversion of > Declude from something unique to just another product. > > > -- > > John Shacklett > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.continentaloffice.com > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
