The negative tests show up in the log with a lower case "n" in front of them:
nNOLEGITCONTENT


You might try that.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip: Eliminating SPF domains from SpamDomains



Well, I spent a good portion of today experimenting with a Filter that could
combine Sniffer, invURIBL and NOLEGITCONTENT... However, it seems as if
NOLEGITCONTENT is never found in the "TESTFAILED" list?


From what I could see a "TESTFAILED CONTAINS NOLEGITCONTENT" is never true?

So - I wonder whether IPNOTINMX suffers the same.


Best Regards Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 05:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip: Eliminating SPF domains from
SpamDomains


... Another double-hit involving SPF would be to marry the logic of IPNotInMX and SPF PASS/FAIL; if you have SPF records for the domain, you don't need IPNotInMX.

Sorry, no working sample.  Putting that into a Declude test has been on my
to-do-list for a long time.

Andrew 8)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt (Forums)
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip: Eliminating SPF domains from
SpamDomains


FYI, Sniffer also has some tests that are similar to SPAMDOMAINS that were formerly causing me double-hits on false positives on my system. Pete has this stuff seemingly coded up into a group and it can be turned off easily if you request it from him.

Matt


---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:28:40 -0400

Hi,

I'm always seeking to eliminate "double failures" for single facts to
prevent false positives and then "up" the weight for groups of tests
that test the same facts.

Several domains that I used to have in SpamDomains (such as
"Excite.com") are publishing SPF.

I used the following DLanalyzer "Advanced" report to find all domains
that failed SpamDomains AND triggered SPFFAIL and then removed them
from SpamDomains...

Advanced Report

4/1/2005 9:22:37 PM Subject ......: Atkins Pharmacy
   Q01E0877D00C06E74  From .........: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    1 Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    2 Test(s) ...: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFFAIL

4/3/2005 10:49:57 AM Subject ......: Top 10 meds bought online
   Q0287746D006853C6  From .........: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    1 Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    2 Test(s) ...: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFFAIL

etc...



Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206





--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to