RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gatewayed Declude Server

[John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)]

Title: Message

There are actually a good number of Imail/Declude installs that either are pure gateway only or do a significant amount of their load for gateway service.   IMHO, for a gateway service, Imail/Declude is and will be a great combination into the foreseeable future.   John T eServices For You   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:20 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gatewayed Declude Server   HI all,   I am in perhaps a different position from some/most of you in that I run Declude on a IMail server but it is just a gateway no mailboxes are on my server. So all I have running from the IMail services is SMTP and Queue Mgr. I have to say that I am reasonable happy with the way things are. Now I am looking to migrate my Declude/IMail to another box and am wondering if I should do the SmarterMail thing?   I know that SmarterMail and Declude had a rocky start but that is mostly better now. I also know that there are a couple of tests that IMail can do that SmarterMail cannot.   So will I get much/some/any performance gain by going to SmarterMail?   Has anyone figured out how to requeue a held mail with a script that can be launched by the user with a link to the web server?   I have a bunch of batch files that call IMAIL1.EXE to send the results to me. Is there a corresponding ability in SmarterMail?   Any other Pros/Cons that people want to impart?   Thanx          Goran Jovanovic      The LAN Shoppe