Thanks Travis. I have now begun to see some results in my declude log file that shows what I did is passing the score on to declude. However, the problem there is that I have set the SPAMASSASSIN action to add a footer that the message is likely SPAM, and it adds that when the test is "failed", even negative scores from SA.
What is your hold weight? I have my routeto (a SPAM folder I review) weight at 10 which doesn't give to many false positives. I wonder what your hold weight is so that I can tailor your command line to suit my "hold" weight if different than yours. Is there a way to ensure that the SPAMC32 weight passed to JM doesn't go negative? Geoff -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 11:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 -e option in JunkMail Hi Geoff, this is what I use: SPAMASSASSIN external weight "e:\imail\declude\spamd\spamc32.exe -d #serverIP# -cw %WEIGHT% -sw 15 -e -et 11 -f" I don't want to check spamassassin if my hold weight is already reached, and I don't want the message to weigh more than 11 from spamassassin, prevents one test from failing a message, thereby reducing false positives. This allows the score to come from spamassassin, not assigning 10 points to all failed spamassassin tests. Most of spam assassin tests only return 1 to 5 points. It is working for me quite well. Travis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Varney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:53 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 -e option in JunkMail > Hi, > I am finally getting SpamAssassin working for my JunkMail with SPAMC32 > (0.5.57) calling SPAMD from a Linux box. With training of the Bayesian > databases well underway I am seeing significantly more SPAM being caught. > However, I'd like to verify the way the SPAMASSASSIN entry in the Declude > global.cfg works. Here is what I had originally: > > SPAMASSASSIN external nonzero > "c:\imail\declude\filters\spamc32\spamc32.exe -u spamd -d <IP of SPAMD > server> -cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -y -f" 10 0 > > This works fine, but the weight of 10 then assumes all SpamAssassin > identified messages are SPAM since Declude considers 10 the score for > SPAM. > So I thought I'd use the -e option for SPAMC32 to pass the actual SA score > to Declude to possibly minimize false positives. > > Here is the line I have now: > > SPAMASSASSIN external nonzero > "c:\imail\declude\filters\spamc32\spamc32.exe -u spamd -d <IP of SPAMD > server> -e -cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -y -f" > > Is this correct usage? By using -e and dropping the weights at the end of > the command line does this then pass the SA weight for Declude to apply to > the total weight? I think this is what's happening now, but wanted to > check > with someone who has used this for a while and knows it better than I do. > > Thanks, > Geoff > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
