George, Let's talk offline. I'll call you later.
Barry -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of george Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though Barry, There are a number of issues with Hijack that need to be addressed. If you can't find the exchange between Scott and myself a couple of years ago, I'll be happy to reconstruct it and send it on again. The major issue was the bypassing of JunkMail processing of email which was automatically released from Hold1. There were others pertaining to all data being memory resident only, thereby precluding any other utilization of the ip addresses that were identified, and having to stop Deccon as the only way to clear an address. This, of course, also set you back to losing everything in memory and having to do a manual cleanup of Hold 1 and Hold2. George > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though > > We are all listening > > Barry > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though > > > It certainly does feel like deja vu all over again! > > Remember back in the old days when spammers meant bad guys who bought > valid AOL accounts and then threw them away after a spam run? > > To turn the topic to the other side, blocking incoming spam, if AUTH > based spamming becomes common, RBL usage will drop off in importance, > and we'll need to emphasize content scanning, and tracking inbound > mail volumes from a given valid account from a given valid ISP. > > It's nice to see that David Barker is listening, as he may see that > robust MIME decoding is in Declude's future: > > - at the minimum to assist the filter text files in the Pro version > - at the minimum to avoid the false positives and wasted CPU in > scanning binary attachments for spam text > - to add features common to all current antispam solutions, e.g. SURBL > - to make the various layers of decoding available to external tests > to make them better and avoid duplication of efforts > - probably a dozen other things that aren't on the tip of my tongue > > Andrew 8) > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:37 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though > > > Wow! > It's like 1995 - 2005 had never been. :-| > > ok, I must say I never worked with Declude Hijack. It's not simply > this what we need now? > > Markus > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though > > > You can read about or get your own version of the password stealing > app here: > > http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/pspv.html > > Andrew 8) > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
