|
Sandy, I have a lot of interest in finding a workaround to the thread issue, and no doubt this has promise. I'm just saying that I'm reserving judgment until it is tested. I will probably test it myself later today since Peter didn't respond yet to your post. If you have some suggestions for what to set these registry values as, please don't hesitate to post them here or on the o.e.support group. Regarding the MS SMTP tarpitting, this was figured out long before issues with that client that turned out to be related to the interaction of IMail and MS SMTP. The MS SMTP tarpitting issue is much more widespread. Certainly it doesn't make sense to delay a 552 response when tarpitting, and either the delay itself, or the fact that this is combined with MS SMTP sending the response out of sequence, produces very understandable issues. When I disabled this tweak, almost all of the issues disappeared immediately. The only remaining issues are ones specifically related to the out of sequence response from MS SMTP, but they are much less frequent than what I was seeing. Matt Sanford Whiteman wrote:
|
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Issues with Windows 2003 FT... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Issues with Windows 2003 ... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Issues with Windows 2003 ... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: MaxDSNSize Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: MaxDSNSize Nick Hayer
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: MaxDSNSize Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: MaxDS... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: MaxD... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] O... Sanford Whiteman
- [Declude.JunkMail] decludep... Will
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decl... David Barker
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decl... Will
