RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter

[Markus Gufler]

Title: Message

Matt   for this case I recommend using   TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-TRAVEL TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-INSUR TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-AV TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-MEDIA TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-SWARE TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-SNAKE TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-SCAMS TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-PORN TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-MALWARE TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-INK TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-CREDIT TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-CASINO TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-OBFUSC TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-GENERAL and maybe also   TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SNIFFER-RICH   instead of   TESTSFAILED 10 CONTAINS SNIFFER   ...for the initial end statement(s) in the combo-filter.   This because only two or tre SNIFFER exit codes seems not to bee very reliable (even if they are still good): 61, 63 and maybe also 57.   Markus   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:04 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter Definitely. One of the better points to this combination is that both tests are completely isolated from one another. The only danger is that some bulk E-mail software/providers will trigger CMDSPACE, and Sniffer does have a moderate problem with false positives on bulk E-mail, IMO, so you might get a few false positives on this. Matt Goran Jovanovic wrote: Hi,   Would CMDSPACE and SNIFFER be a good combo test to have? I already have some other combos with SNIFFER.   Thanx   Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions