Considering that AOL and Yahoo both have issues with blocking legitimate E-mail, and Yahoo is just about the most exploited service provider on the planet, responsible for a great number of phishing and Nigerian scams, I find it quite hypocritical for them to in the business of charging companies for the right to spam their customers. This is really what this is all about.

The BondedSender program is much the same. They charge companies with spam problems a fee for protection, but they market the service to users like us as a way to validate the legitimacy of what they bond. If anything, a bonded IP is more likely to spam than one that is not bonded. Once when I reported the spam service Virtumundo to BondedSender for spamming, their response was to keep them bonded only for the IP address that they used to send to HotMail accounts. What do you think that was all about? IronPort also of course owns SpamCop and sells boxes that some spammers use for bulk-mailing.

I get the impression that this is just Yahoo and AOL trying to profit from two groups of bulk-mailers, 1) ones that feel it necessary to protect their campaigns from being blacklisted by these services because Yahoo and AOL are difficult or even impossible for them to deal with when users repeatedly report legitimate E-mail for being spam, and 2) spammers, yep, AOL and Yahoo now want to get in on the BondedSender model and profit from spamming.

Matt



Dave Doherty wrote:

I'd like to charge senders a penny per email. Wouldn't you? That is the old post office model.

I just don't think that goodmail has the right model.

-d

----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Declude.JunkMail@declude.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:33 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Extortion


New Service Would Charge E-Mail Senders
http://my.netscape.com/corewidgets/news/story.psp?cat=51180&id=2006020521220001389466

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Two of the world's biggest e-mail account
providers, Yahoo Inc. and America Online, plan to introduce a
service that would charge senders a fee to route their e-mail
directly to a user's mailbox without first passing through junk
mail filters, representatives of both companies said Sunday.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to