Regarding the preview of messages for spamming review. You can use the preview option of version 3.0. You can preview every message without opening it. First time the page is heavy to load but it saves a lot of time. There are two preview options, small and large preview.
 
Luis Arango
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 04:42 p.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

Kevin,

I don't believe they introduced this, though they closed many gaps that they had in IMail equivalent functionality in this release, and changed a few other things that concerned me.  For instance, they introduced sub-mailbox functionality, and they also gave us the ability to turn off autoresponders and catch-all's.

My greatest concerns about SmarterMail's Web interface are these three things:
1) Virtually no control of content outside of skinning, so you can't tweak things that they don't expressly allow you to tweak (such as removing a link to a piece of functionality).

2) Webmail uses a separate page for viewing a message list and viewing a message, so you have to click back and forth, and this is completely impractical for doing any form of spam review.  It doesn't matter that much for occasional end-use, but it is certainly not lingua franca for Webmail clients.

3) Integration of SmarterMail spam blocking functionality in the interface can be confusing to end users if you handle spam outside of that system.  I'm not sure if Declude has a tie in to that functionality, but I'm guessing not at this moment.
...and also one big non-interface thing that also concerns me a great deal:
4) Proprietary mailbox format, which makes them pretty much uneditable (or at least I can't figure out how to do it without a hex editor).  I really wish they would abandon this and go to simple text files.
I host E-mail on SmarterMail, and I am generally happy with that, but I won't move my Declude setup there until they change these things because my hands are tied by the needs of my system.  Program aliases are real nice to have, but I'm not currently tied down by that need.

There are plenty of good points, so don't let me make it sound bad.  They have things like archiving of E-mail for SOX compliance, shared calendaring, Outlook integration with calendaring, tasks, content filtering, great performance and stability, and a nicer interface than IMail 8.x- (but I prefer IMail's wide flexibility in the new Webmail a great, great deal more, but that isn't a universal need).  Naturally, people should do due-diligence before upgrading or migrating, especially on a brand new major release.

Matt






Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have checked the docs
and am going back and forth with SmarterTools sales, but not to be found.

It is the only missing feature I would need to move away from Imail.



So now here is my declude question.

Could I use smartermail/declude, with an external test, to identify a
message form a specific account then process and move the message/delete a
message to where I would like. What would happen when declude gets control
back and the message no longer exists?


We currently use program aliases to process EDI orders from customers.


Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
____________________________________
Changing the way industry works.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  

Reply via email to