Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT?

[Scott Fisher]

I've long wanted a SKIPIFWEIGHTLESSTHAN myself.   My thinking is that it would cut down on some CPU time for filters that wouldn't even effect the email's weight because they were scoring low enough.   Maybe with version 4 being PRO across the board, we can expect to see some filter enhancements. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kami Razvan To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:58 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT? Hi..   Yes we can.. that is what I am doing now..   I was hoping we can have a construct that allows us to do it inside the filter.   If one can have a construct like:   RUN IF WEIGHT IS BETWEEN   Min & Max   So the filter runs if the weight is >= Min and <=Max then one can truly set filters and fine tune conditions.   It will allow an IF statement construct..   combining this with MINWEIGHT can easily set IF STATEMENT with Exit conditions.   otherwise we have to do it outside the filter in global with several filters and conditions.. much cleaner if done inside the filter.   I searched the manual but did not see it-- I was hoping it was added and I missed it in the release notes..    thanks .. hopefully it will be added.   Regards, - Kami From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:45 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFWEIGHT - RUNIFWEIGHT? could you chain a few skipifweightfilters?   under10.txt skipifweight 10 remoteip 0 contains .   filter2.txt testsfailed end notcontains under10.txt