|
John T wrote:
Since WEIGHTRANGE is designed for final actions, how and why would you use it in a filter?
--
Good question..
The issue is simple.. in our system I have
been monitoring the results of all of our filters and watching every spam that
is caught in various weight ranges and tabulated the weigh versus the false
positives.
In weight range of 31-49 (we delete on
50+) - 100% of emails with an image in the body are spam. In the past
month in that weight range I have seen 1 false positive but if anything has an
image then it is spam.
So I want to create a filter that adds 10
points to the email if the weight is above 31 and has failed the image in body
filter.
& I want it run at the end..
While we can skip a test based on the weight
we can not run a test based on the weight of the email up to that
point.
Hope that clarifies the
intent..
Regards,
- Kami
|
- [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order Kami Razvan
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order Nick Hayer
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order John T \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weightrange order John T \(Lists\)
