We’re getting
the same. Also using Declude with smartermail. Because Declude doesn’t
appear to be scanning the headers there is no way for us to stop them. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin I’m
getting a lot of messages that have only a graphic in them. The graphic
appears to have been damaged as only about ½ of it displays. Declude has
not modified the headers at all so I’m not sure if these are being
scanned or not. I don’t know how it could be bypassing
Declude. I have attached the .msg file. Anyone have any ideas what
might be causing this? I’m
running Declude 3.0.5.22 and SmarterMail 2.6. The
header is as follows: Return-Path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue Feb 28 00:24:32 2006 Received:
from 225-65-10-72.planters.net [72.10.65.225] by matrix.martek.net with SMTP;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:24:32 -0600 Date:
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:24:22 +0100 Return-path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From:
"Abrahams"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:
C1alis 10 Pills 20 mg $89.95 Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version:
1.0 Content-Type:
multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="------------ms020700070106060404020304" X-Priority:
3 X-MSMail-Priority:
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thanks, Evans
Martin EVANS
MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTING:
http://www.martek.net PROGRAMMING:
http://www.martekware.com iPlus
Info Browser – IPB’s IMail Migration Tool, password browser,
reporting suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail administrator should
be without. http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96 |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Dave Beckstrom
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Erik
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Harry Vanderzand
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Dave Beckstrom
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Colbeck, Andrew