Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request MINWEIGHTTOFAIL

[Nick Hayer]

Hi Scott - I do not quite understand - you could score  each line [hit] with the filter protected with a minweight to fail [to protect against false positives ] and if necessary to contain the filter from  overpowering the scoring a maxweight to cap. The filter only runs once and will accumulate a total past the minweighttofail if the data supports it. Are you saying instead  if it scores "7" punish the email with more weight eg: scores 7 weight is 10 scores 8 weight is 12 etc? -Nick Scott Fisher wrote: I'd like to see some kind of sliding scale to expand the MINWEIGHTTOFAIL processing. I currently use a MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 4 to apply weight to 419 scams. For me a MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 4 is the bottom end, and I'd like to not put on an overpowering weight because of false positive potential. I'd certainly like to apply even more weight if this failed 7 lines and even more for 10 lines. I can't see a way of doing this short of runing the filter multiple times, and it is pretty body filter heavy. ----------------------------------------------------- Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies 191 S Gary Ave Carol Stream, IL 60188 630-462-2323   This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Although Farm Progress Companies has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.