> So  it wouldn't be perfect, but it would probably work decently as a
> fail-over.

Considering  that  there's  no  other  way other than short TTLs to do
geographic load-balancing w/failover -- even mega-hitting GLB hardware
has  a  rather  explicit  reliance  on  the TTLs it gives out based on
response  time  probes and so on -- I'd say it's as perfect as the DNS
part of load-balancing can ever be.

> Note  that  this  setup  won't  do  hardly  anything  as far as load
> balancing goes since primary should always be hit first unless there
> is an issue (connectivity or RFC compliance).

Er, no... that isn't the way NS records are used. Recursors looking up
your NS records do not "know" that you went to Dotster or whatever and
entered  ns1  before  ns2.  The NS records handed out by the roots are
used  by  recursors  in  what  can be called a random order (the order
actually  has  to  do with response time as well, but assuming for the
moment unsaturated bandwidth and identical hardware at both sites, you
can call it random).

--Sandy


------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases!
  
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/
  
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to