David,

You also need to add a new whitelist tag (whitelistunique?) that only
whitelists the "TO" recipient if it's the only recipient for the email.

This bit about whitelisting all recipients if one is whitelisted is a
problem.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List
> 
> With reference to X-Declude-RefID: it is part of the *Zerohour test
doesn't
> operate as other tests issue.
> 
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
> Schmidt
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for posting! Openness is a great confidence builder! Seeing that
> problems are at least being recognized goes a long way to giving me some
> small flicker of hope that things at Declude might turn around yet.
> 
> Now your corporate management has to prove themselves by demonstrating
that
> they are finally serious about fulfilling the service contracts we
purchased
> by not allowing crucial problems to remain open for yet another year. They
> cannot keep holding out their hands each year, if the money is not spent
on
> the intended purpose. Fixing the Auto-Whitelist with a simple MDAC SQL
query
> against the Imail 2006 Workgroupshare database is no rocket science. It
> might take a day - but not a year.
> 
> PS:
> This is a minor issue and probably doesn't deserve to be on your list -
but
> I never got a reply on how to suppress the empty and unwanted
> 
>       X-Declude-RefID:
> 
> header.
> 
> Best Regards
> Andy Schmidt
> 
> Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
> Fax:    +1 201 934-9206
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:36 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are
> currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for
new
> functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on
> this list.
> 
> *Line Terminator Problem
> 
> *Auto whitelist Imail 2006
> 
> *Reported Memory Leaks & Decludeproc crash on zero pointers
> 
> *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests
> 
> *Zip vulnerability
> 
> *Attach function bug (forward as attachment)
> 
> *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable
> 
> *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated
> emails
> 
> *Attached web pages seen as .com files
> 
> *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking
> 
> *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64
> 
> *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters
> 
> *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels
> 
> *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases
> 
> David Barker
> Director of Product Development
> Your Email security is our business
> 978.499.2933 office
> 978.988.1311 fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
> Cox
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> Thanks, David.  We appreciate your efforts.
> 
> Darin.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> 
> I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just
give
> me some time (days) and I will get it posted.
> 
> David B
> www.declude.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
> Cox
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> Thanks, David.  We appreciate your input.
> 
> Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked?
I
> realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call
volume
> significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more
comfortable
> of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade
to
> 4.x.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Darin.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> 
> Darin,
> 
> Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to
> standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator
> issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a
> definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some
> additional resources to further expedite a solution.
> 
> David Barker
> Director of Product Development
> Your Email security is our business
> 978.499.2933 office
> 978.988.1311 fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
> Cox
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> David Barker,  Can you tell us the status of this old case?  What progress
> has been made on this seemingly critical issue?
> 
> Darin.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
> Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and
unscanned
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only
issue.
> I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude
> case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500.
> 
> Michael Thomas
> Mathbox
> 978-683-6718
> 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
> Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to