Hi John, you read it that way? It's actually set up right now so that [1] the E-mail will stop processing, [2] the test will *not* fail (this may change -- I'm not sure why it was set up that way), and [3] the weight will be exactly what it should have been when END was reached.
If I read it, [1] and [3] (which is that the weight will be what it was when END was reached) are stated as fact - and it regarding [2] (that the test did NOT fail) he said "this may change". My reading is, that the possible change that the "NOT fail" might be changed to a "fail"? Am I reading it wrong? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 01:05 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? That link only shows that Scott was thinking of changing it from 0 weight to a fail which would have added the weight. That explains his point 3 in that what ever the weight of the message was before the test will remain. Remember, to add weight, the test must FAIL. He stated it did not FAIL and therefore weight was never added. John T eServices For You "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? Hi John, >> Was never changed. << Please read the URL I posted: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg14009.html As you can tell, ORIGINALLY it did return the weight. He was thinking of it even FAILING the test (if there was a weight). >> What you should have been using is MAXWEIGHT at the top, or STOPATFIRSTHIT. << Kindly, please read the sample I had posted (bottom of this message). Your reply doesn't address the issue of trying to make some sections of a test conditional. Example, the goal is to return either 1 or 2 or 3 if test1 or test2 occur with test3 - and to only add test4 and test5, if test3 is not true. SKIPIFWEIGHT 20 MAXWEIGHT 3 TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test1 TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test2 TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS test3 TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test4 TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test5 etc etc Please demonstrate how MAXWEIGHT or STOPATFIRSTHIT would do this in a single filter? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:34 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? Was never changed. Look at the directives. END means end the filter. What you should have been using is MAXWEIGHT at the top, or STOPATFIRSTHIT. John T eServices For You "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:42 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? Importance: High Wow - really? When was that changed? I know that the filter "test" itself did not show as "failed", but the WEIGHT always carried over! Take a look at Scott's reply when this feature was implemented and the weight-result of the END was being discussed: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg14009.html "[1] the E-mail will stop processing, [2] the test will *not* fail (this may change -- I'm not sure why it was set up that way), and [3] the weight will be exactly what it should have been when END was reached." And it's only logical. If you WANTED a filter to return 0, then you would simply place the 'END' lines at the BEGINNING of the Filter! If you place the 'END' line behind other lines that accumulated weight, then it clearly is the intention that the weights be COUNTED and that only any FURTHER weights not be added! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:06 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? The END function means END the filter and do not add any of the points for that filter. If the END condition is met it is as if the filter never ran. David B www.declude.com _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT? Hi, Can anyone confirm that the 'END' statement is functioning properly. I've been noticing/suspecting that certain test combinations had much too little weights and I finally have time to debug that. This is the entry in the GLOBAL.CFG CONTENT filter D:\IMail\Declude\CONTENTfilter.txt x 0 0 Means - the filter itself has a weight of 0 - all weights would be assigned IN the filter Here CONTENTfilter.txt: SKIPIFWEIGHT 20 MAXWEIGHT 9 TESTSFAILED 7 CONTAINS SNIFFER TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS SNIFFER-SCAMS TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS SNIFFER-PORN TESTSFAILED 2 CONTAINS SNIFFER-MALWARE TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS SNIFFER-OBFUSC TESTSFAILED -2 CONTAINS SNIFFER-IP TESTSFAILED 4 CONTAINS INV-URIBL-WT1 TESTSFAILED 5 CONTAINS INV-URIBL-WT2 TESTSFAILED 6 CONTAINS INV-URIBL-WT3 TESTSFAILED 7 CONTAINS INV-URIBL-WT4 TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SPAMCOP TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS NJABLSOURCES TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS AHBLSOURCES TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS AHBLPSSL TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SORBS-SPAM TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SENDERDB-BLOCK TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SBL TESTSFAILED 2 CONTAINS SNIFFER-IP As far as I can tell, the Filter works fine as long as there is only SNIFFER and/or URIBL and will return the proper weights around 7 through 9. However, if it hits the END statement is appears as if it always returns ZERO. In other words, it loses the weight that had been accumulated up to that point. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
