Peter, Thanks for the response. Darrell had pointed us to WeightGate about a year ago - that helped clean up a few CPU issues we were having at that time.
------- Randy A. Technical Support Director Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-442-5300 http://globalweb.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Pete McNeil To: Herb Guenther Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:31 PM Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today? On Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 2:09:23 PM, Herb wrote: > Hi Randy; We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the declude conf files with a schedule). It is a nice tool but will bog things down. I'm curious - (I don't use this but many of my customers do) Is it possible to run Inv-URIBL only on messages that have not yet reached a hold (or other appropriate) weight? Perhaps using weightgate? If SNF is running ahead of it then would that have the effect of only running inv-URIBL on messages that have not already been tagged as spam by SNF? What are the limits of conditional test triggers in the Declude environment (aside from AVAFTERJM)? _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
