Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10

[Nick Hayer]

Well said Darin and I do agree totally - -Nick. Darin Cox wrote: True... but it's not about Scott anymore. Declude is a larger company, with more resources, and should be documenting this stuff... especially in light of all of the issues trying to get a new version to market. This kind of documentation will go a long way towards making the user community more comfortable with the new product. And let's face it folks... we're not asking for a lot here. Just a quick posting to the list to let everyone know a new release is available, and a quick statement on the website as to what it fixes or doesn't fix. A known issues list with the latest release would be extremely helpful as well. Would save many of us a ton of time. This would take very little time, and has to be documented internally in the software development process, so why not make it available to help the user community? This is not about blame, so don't take it wrong. We all understand there were a lot of factors involved in the new release because of architectural changes by Ipswitch. This is entirely about helping users stay current, get any problems they might be experiencing resolved, and stabilize the product. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Declude.Virus@declude.com> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:54 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10 I would consider 3.0.5.10/11 interim releases... Scott would never have documented them. I too would like to see the release notes updated with each and every version... but it's a long long standing issue. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Declude.Virus@declude.com> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:36 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10 On that note, I would also like to reraise the need for documentation on reported/known issues with a particular release. A simple page with a quick note about each reported issue would be very beneficial. Also, I would think each release would be reported on the Declude Releases list like Scott used to do. Now we have to go check the website for new releases. Very inefficient. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Declude.JunkMail@declude.com>; <Declude.Virus@declude.com> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 12:27 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] 3.0.5.10 This one is just for the record since .10 is not on the website anymore -- thank goodness. Put 3.0.5.10 in place to this afternoon (before I knew .11 was available). MISTAKE! Things looked ok at first, but didn't realize mail was stacking up in \proc\. When I was not getting anything at the house, came back in (around 11pm) and found 6,500 msgs in \proc. Put in .11 and restarted. It is flowing now. Wonder if that is the reason .10 disappeared from the web site so fast. This raises (at least for me) an old discussion. I know new documentation for each little update is not possible or even reasonable to expect. But maybe a quick and dirty page on what the update fixed.?? John --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.