On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 12:56:30PM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > >>>>> "Richard" == Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Richard> Looks great ;-} Would it be possible to support socks > Richard> gateway lusers (like me)? > > Richard> I'd think that simply adding a -lsocks[5] to the link > Richard> would be sufficient to support both socks and non-socks > Richard> access. > > Can you test this? If adding a -lsocks5 is all we need, then we can > probably do it no problem, but that would require moving libsocks5 > to the required section.
Um - _is_ there a socks5 in Debian? I've packaged socks5 (as Richard knows), but the license is incompatible with DFSG (or even non-free :-(). I'll look at the free socks sometime - it looks like it should be stable! NEC socks-1.0r7 doesn't like glibc2.1 (but maybe it just needs a recompile?) Cheers Adrian email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers Avoid tiresome goat sacrifices -=- use Debian Linux http://www.debian.org
