Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:54:42 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 1999 01:16:12 +0000
Received: (qmail 22896 invoked from network); 27 Aug 1999 01:16:09 -0000
Received: from pool15.ka.ilk.de (HELO sanctum) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 1999 01:16:09 -0000
Received: from jae by sanctum with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11KAcJ-0007fv-00; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 03:15:43 +0200
From: Juergen A. Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: short info about why packages are being kept back
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 03:15:43 +0200
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.11
Severity: wishlist
apt-get currently just lists packages that have been kept for some
reason.
To find out *why* they're kept back, you need to do an apt-get install
on them. (And this is really not obvious... especially for inexperienced
folks. I mean, the package is installed, so why should I do
apt-get install?)
Maybe a -v (verbose) flag or an -i (info) flag could be added.
It would simply have to spit out what apt-get install spits out when you
ask it. I mean, the code already *has* to be there (somewhere ;-).
Bye, J
PS: Yes, it would be better if packages with broken dependencies
or other problems that make them uninstallable would be
dinstalled... :-/
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux sanctum 2.2.11 #1 Sun Aug 22 16:46:45 CEST 1999 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-0pre10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii libstdc++2.9-gl 2.91.66-2 The GNU stdc++ library (EGCS version)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 43582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2000 02:54:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 16 21:54:44 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from crash.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.220]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13aUbM-0005NW-00; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 21:54:44 -0500
Received: from wakko.deltatee.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by crash.ab.videon.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA15703
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:54:43 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (wakko.deltatee.com) [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 13aUbK-0004wf-00 (Debian); Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:54:42 -0600
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:54:42 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After 1 year of consideration..
I think this should be handled by any APT front end.
Jason
