Your message dated Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:27:04 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#126450: apt: Puzzling behavior when package binary not
available for architecture
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2001 23:42:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 25 17:42:52 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cepheus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.195]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16J1Df-0008HL-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 17:42:51 -0600
Received: from Obsession.azstarnet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [169.197.9.26])
by cepheus.azstarnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA17464;
Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:42:47 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/
Received: by Obsession.azstarnet.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 25 Dec
2001 16:43:29 -0700
From: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: Puzzling behavior when package binary not available for
architecture
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:43:29 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: minor
I was trying to install mpsql. I saw it had stable and unstable
versions at packages.debian.org. apt-get returned:
Couldn't find package mpsql
This was puzzling to me, I finally navigated manually to pool/m/mpsql
and found that there was no powerpc version, only i386 and alpha.
This will become a more common occurrence as we continue to add more
architectures, I'd like to suggest a different message when this happens,
such as:
"Package %s unavailable for %s in %s distribution at %s",
"mpsql", "powerpc", "unstable", "mirrors.kernel.org/debian"
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux Obsession 2.2.19 #1 Sat Apr 14 23:20:24 CDT 2001 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126450-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2001 06:27:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 00:27:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from crack-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.33]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16J7Ws-0000Hj-00; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 00:27:06 -0600
Received: (qmail 29339 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2001 06:27:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.82.81.190])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by crack-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 26 Dec 2001 06:27:05 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 16J7Wq-0000fv-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:27:04 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:27:04 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#126450: apt: Puzzling behavior when package binary not
available for architecture
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, Chris Tillman wrote:
> This will become a more common occurrence as we continue to add more
> architectures, I'd like to suggest a different message when this happens,
> such as:
The amount of extra index data required to generate a message like this is
far to great to justify it. I'm pretty sure packages.debian.org has a
little reference to the available arches on the page someplace.
Jason
