Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:57:21 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156132: apt: --purge is OVERACTIVE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2002 01:47:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 09 20:47:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cs6625175-67.austin.rr.com (HillCountryPeress) [66.25.175.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17dLM3-0004Zk-00; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:47:47 -0500
Received: by HillCountryPeress (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 431A63D4C; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:47:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: Hunter Peress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: --purge is OVERACTIVE
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:47:54 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
DOING:
apt-get --purge remove PACKAGE
then hitting yes/enter
will purge the dependencies that are also being removed. THIS SHOULD
REQUIRE AN EXTRA CONFIG.
for example, apt-get --purge remove exim purged my apache conf files and
caused me hours of trouble.
OK folks?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux HillCountryPeress 2.4.18 #3 Sun Jul 7 01:49:51 CDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-7 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156132-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2002 01:57:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 09 20:57:58 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-71-223-10.cg.shawcable.net (pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17dLVt-00054F-00; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:57:58 -0500
Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr1so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.177])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
09 Aug 2002 19:57:27 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml10so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.80])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
09 Aug 2002 19:57:27 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from wakko.debian.net ([24.86.210.128])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
09 Aug 2002 19:57:26 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17dLVO-00069c-00; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:57:26 -0600
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:57:21 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#156132: apt: --purge is OVERACTIVE
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hunter Peress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Hunter Peress wrote:
> DOING:
> apt-get --purge remove PACKAGE
>
> then hitting yes/enter
>
> will purge the dependencies that are also being removed. THIS SHOULD
> REQUIRE AN EXTRA CONFIG.
Er, this is how it is documented to work, why on earth would you think it
would do anything else?
APT even shows a special mark on all the packages it is going to purge
when it prints out what it is going to do!
This sounds reminicient of the old 'rm -rf /' is harmful, thus rm should
need an even specialer flag.
Jason
