Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:34:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WISHLIST: apt could query/check for critical bugs before
upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 22:09:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 19 16:09:32 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp26131004.columbus.rr.com (mandelbrot) [24.26.131.4] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18EGYl-0005a4-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:09:31 -0600
Received: from bt by mandelbrot with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 18EGfC-0007Jh-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:16:10 -0500
From: B Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WISHLIST: apt could query/check for critical bugs before upgrade
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.40
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.40
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:16:10 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: B Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0
tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,SUPERLONG_LINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I wonder if it will be possible to have apt or dpkg query the bugs database and
avoid upgrading packages (unless forced) with critical or grave bugs. At least
a warning would be good. Checking ever upgradable package manually on
bugs.debian.org can be too time consuming.
Alternatively (this is probably far fetched) I wonder if it is possible to
maintain historical information of how dependency trees have changed over time
so aptor dpkg can move a distribution both forward and backward in time. I say
far fetched because I don't know why this is not implemented in any package
management system I am aware of.
sincerely
B Thomas
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mandelbrot 2.4.18 #1 Thu Jul 25 16:44:16 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169814-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2003 21:34:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 12 15:34:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Xpkj-00083E-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:34:45 -0600
Received: from 209-6-103-23.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([209.6.103.23] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 18Xpkg-0005D3-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:34:42 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18Xpkg-0008TR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:34:42 -0500
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:34:42 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WISHLIST: apt could query/check for critical bugs before upgrade
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
This is beyond the scope of apt, but look at http://bugs.debian.org/169361
for something like what you want.
--
- mdz
