Your message dated Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Feature request: apt-cache currentver and apt-cache newver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2001 14:06:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 14 09:06:48 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts7.bellnexxia.net (tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net)
[209.226.175.40]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14zIzo-0006W7-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:06:48 -0500
Received: from projectile.projectile.ca ([64.231.35.8])
by tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:06:17 -0400
Received: from msherman by projectile.projectile.ca with local (Exim 3.22 #1
(Debian))
id 14zIzI-0004BE-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:06:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:06:16 -0400
From: Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Feature request: apt-cache currentver and apt-cache newver
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to see apt-cache support two new commands, currentver and
newver. Both commands would take a list of packages, and print
the following on stdout:
packagename: version
for each package parameter. "version" should be the version that
is either currently installed (for currentver) or would be installed
by apt-get install packagename (for newver).
I've started looking at the source, and may be able to add this myself;
if I do get it done, i'll reply to this bug with a patch. If you think
I'm doing this in the wrong place, please let me know where it would
be more appropriate.
- Marc
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux projectile 2.2.19 #1 Mon May 7 09:24:37 EDT 2001 i586
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.3-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 97454-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2003 18:47:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 13:47:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts17.bellnexxia.net (tomts17-srv.bellnexxia.net)
[209.226.175.71]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19X3gw-0006yi-00; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:47:54 -0500
Received: from projectile.projectile.ca ([64.229.14.4])
by tomts17-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:47:53 -0400
Received: from vomit.projectile.ca ([192.168.1.3] helo=vomit)
by projectile.projectile.ca with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19X3gv-0006bV-00; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:47:53 -0400
From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Feature request: apt-cache currentver and apt-cache newver
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:47:53 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Zimmerman
>
> Does "apt-cache policy" do what you want?
Yes, it does, and I've been using it for a while now.
Thanks,
- Marc
