Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:57:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an apt bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2002 12:11:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 03 06:11:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-48-23.37-151.net24.it (shanpu.ethernet) [151.37.23.48] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 188JbJ-0003ky-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 06:11:33 -0600
Received: from nausicaa.ethernet (nausicaa.ethernet [192.168.1.4])
        by shanpu.ethernet (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-6Woody) with ESMTP id 
gA3CBTA1002895;
        Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:11:29 +0100
Received: from nausicaa.ethernet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by nausicaa.ethernet (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-6Woody) with ESMTP id 
gA3CBTYn018708;
        Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:11:29 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by nausicaa.ethernet (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-6Woody) id gA3CBTQA018706;
        Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:11:29 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andrea Borgia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-get install: unmet dependencies with woody+updates+proposed for 
libssl-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 13:11:29 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0
        tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal

I have the following lines in sources.list:
-cut-
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
deb ftp://nonus.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org woody/updates main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian woody-proposed-updates main contrib non-free
-cut-

Running apt-get install libssl-dev gives:
libssl-dev: Depends: libssl0.9.6 (= 0.9.6c-2.woody.1) but 0.9.6g-0.woody.1
is to be installed

Cache has been cleared and updated prior to running apt-get install and
proxy is disabled. In case it matters, libc6 is from testing and has been
pulled in by installing gcc-3.2 previously.

Here is what apt-cache says:

apt-cache show libssl0.9.6 | grep Filename
Filename: pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.6_0.9.6g-0.woody.1_i386.deb
Filename: pool/updates/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.6_0.9.6c-2.woody.1_i386.deb
Filename: pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.6_0.9.6c-2_i386.deb

apt-cache show libssl-dev | grep Filename
Filename: pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.6g-0.woody.1_i386.deb
Filename: pool/updates/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.6c-2.woody.1_i386.deb
Filename: pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.6c-2_i386.deb

I solved (as suggested by Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for Bug#167494) with the following:

apt-get install libssl-dev=0.9.6g-0.woody.1

but I thought apt should have dealt with it on its own.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nausicaa 2.4.19-nausicaa #1 Sat Oct 26 15:57:09 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.2.5-14.3        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU stdc++ library


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167560-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2003 03:00:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 22 21:57:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19f9p0-0000X5-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:57:42 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
        by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
        id 19f9oz-00013I-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:57:41 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 19f9oz-00084o-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:57:41 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:57:41 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not an apt bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

It looks like you had libssl0.9.6 version 0.9.6g-0.woody.1 installed from
somewhere, though this version is not present in the woody archives.

Everything works fine with the versions in the archives, and apt's behaviour
in this situation seems correct as well.

-- 
 - mdz

Reply via email to