Your message dated Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:32:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Unreproducible, no submitter response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2002 21:57:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 28 15:57:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx12.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.88]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18HWf8-0001vt-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:57:34 -0600
Received: from sanctum.jerhard.org (dialin-212-144-170-061.arcor-ip.net
[212.144.170.61])
by mx12.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EA737E0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:57:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wanderer.local ([192.168.1.3] helo=wanderer.jerhard.org)
by sanctum.jerhard.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18HWeV-0002SW-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:56:55 +0100
Received: from jae by wanderer.jerhard.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18HWcy-0000Oq-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:55:20 +0100
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:55:20 +0100
From: =?us-ascii?B?PT91dGYtOD9RP0o9QzM9QkNyZ2VuPz0gQS4=?= Erhard <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: conflicts with installed virtual package not detected
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.64
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_A=2E_Erhard?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
This is what I get. Maybe it's important that "links" is not just a virtual
package, but also a real one. Or maybe not.
wanderer ~ % sudo apt-get --purge install links-ssl elinks =20
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, elinks is already the newest version.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
links-ssl=20
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 367 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/348kB of archives. After unpacking 999kB will be used.
Reading changelogs... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
dpkg: regarding .../links-ssl_0.98-1_i386.deb containing links-ssl:
links-ssl conflicts with links
elinks provides links and is installed.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/links-ssl_0.98-1_i386.deb (-=
-unpack):
conflicting packages - not installing links-ssl
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wanderer 2.4.19-wanderer #5 Mon Aug 12 15:57:12 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11 The GNU stdc++ library
-- no debconf information
--=20
J=C3=BCrgen A. Erhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MARS http://mars.jerhard.org
"All language designers are arrogant.
Goes with the territory..." -- Larry Wall
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE95pDIN0B+CS56qs0RAvt6AJ9Gq582IuTkCXBKRaurpdVukIkgxACgkuAY
8oCwXhvVXa8WbkT/ob0R3oE=
=8Hos
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171101-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2003 22:32:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 26 17:32:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A318e-0001iV-00; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:32:36 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 1A318e-000092-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:32:36 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A318d-0003ju-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:32:35 -0400
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:32:35 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unreproducible, no submitter response
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
I have been unable to reproduce this bug, and the submitter has not provided
any assistance.
--
- mdz
