On 12/11/18 2:55 AM, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:30:49PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >> GDB has changed somewhat over the years; are the strings those >> modules seek still valid or do we need to accept both "old" and >> "new" message sets? Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI >> mode, possibly in another module?
There are already some MI test cases in GDB.
> I think DejaGnu needs to be able to still test quite old versions.
>
> Using GDB MI from within DejaGnu is a really interesting idea. How
> stable has the MI interface been in practice?
Tom would know more, but at the last Cauldron I attended, several of
us had a long talk about this. MI doesn't cover the full range of what a
user can do with GDB. An MI testsuite would be good, but we'd still need
all the current GDB tests.
- rob -
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
