On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:25:06PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Would this be for GDB's own testing, or for something else?
No, for controlling GDB from DejaGnu. Consider a version of gdb_comm_delete_breakpoints that interacts with the controlled GDB process using MI instead of matching string output using Expect. Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu