On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:25:06PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:

> Would this be for GDB's own testing, or for something else?

No, for controlling GDB from DejaGnu. Consider a version of
gdb_comm_delete_breakpoints that interacts with the controlled GDB
process using MI instead of matching string output using Expect.

Cheers, Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu

Reply via email to