I personally wouldn't move without.
If you want a drawing tool then they don't come much worse than Rose.
But if you want an extensible repository for your analysis and design
information that can stay coupled with the code, then I have only succeeded
in doing it with Rose.
I'm sure some of the modern cheap tools coming thru probably can integrate
well, but having invested very significantly in tight integration some time
ago, I am unlikely to move without strong reason.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Steve Agnew
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 4:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: [DUG]: Rational Rose comments anyone?
Hi folks,
Andy Bell here has just come back from a course on Rational Rose UML
which was heavy on the "How to use it" material but pretty light on the "Why
and when to use it" information.
Is anyone using this tool with Delphi? If so, how have you found it, and
what
sort of projects does it suit? Or have you looked at it and decided against
using it. Either way, all comments welcomed.
Thanks, Steve Agnew.
BankLink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+64 9 377 7790 (NZ)
1 800 123 242 (Aust)
www.banklink5.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
