Doesnt matter what we think. Borland is committed to being more MIcrosofty
then Microsoft. Remember MS started the bandwagon by saying that there will
be a new WIndows release every year starting with 95... they didnt quite
make it. :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 13:43
Subject: [DUG]: Delphi 6 and proposed release structure
> Hi all,
> Would you be more influence to upgrade if the period between versions was
> greater. I personally think 12 to 18 months is too short. What if the
> major release version was at least 24 months apart. After about a year
you
> got say a .5 release and there were more maintenance releases that fixed
> errors in the interim. All these releases being free of course. I don't
> like how borland won't make additions to the product in maintenance
> releases. Maybe further enhancements would become available in the .5
> release. A possible structure could be
> Delphi 6 release
> 3 months Delphi 6.01 released
> 6 months Delphi 6.02 released (if it is like Delphi 4 that is!)
> 12 months Delphi 6.5 released - This release would add new functionality
> and even updated interfaces for OTAPI's.
> 18 months Delphi 6.51 released
> 24 months or more Delphi 7 released.
> I think this would be better. What do others think?
>
> JED
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
