I agree. The use of assigned() is totally unnecessary in that context.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Neven MacEwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 12:02
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Freeing Stringlists.


> Andreas
>
> I must completely agree with you 'Free'  and FreeandNil() can always
> be called on a nil pointer, This is a language function, Therefore
by doing
> the
> assignment check for 'readability' you are essentially advertising
your
> ignorance of the language IMHO
>
> Neven
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Toth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:37 AM
> Subject: RE: [DUG]: Freeing Stringlists.
>
>
> > That's perfectly fine with me. I just think it's a waste of time,
that's
> > all. After all, after you've found that it's not nil, you'll have
to call
> > FreeAndNil() that will do this test again for you. And, in most
instances,
> > you'll probably find that Assigned() evaluates to true anyway (OK,
so I
> > realise this depends on the code, but in my experience this is
most of the
> > case), and hence doubling up on your efforts. IMHO, readability is
only
> > impaired if you don't know what Free() and FreeAndNil() does.
> >
> >
> > -Andreas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Guy Brown
> > Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 10:19
> > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> > Subject: RE: [DUG]: Freeing Stringlists.
> >
> >
> > I stand corrected.  However I still think that it is better
practise to
> > explicitly test Assigned() first for the reasons that David
mentioned.
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas Toth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > And what do you think Free() does -- checks to see if it is nil or
not,
> just
> > like you are doing with Assigned().
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Guy Brown
> >
> > Nope, FreeAndNil() frees the object and then nil's the reference
you
> passed
> > to it so that any other clean up code that uses Assigned() to test
the
> same
> > reference won't free the object a second time.
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > ------------
> > >From sysutils:
> >
> > procedure FreeAndNil(var Obj);
> > var
> >   P: TObject;
> > begin
> >   P := TObject(Obj);
> >   TObject(Obj) := nil;  // clear the reference before destroying
the
> object
> >   P.Free;
> > end;
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas Toth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > There's no need to use Assigned() since FreeAndNil() performs a
similar
> > test...
> >
> >
> > -Andreas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Peter Speden
> > Try
> >
> > If Assigned (includelist) then
> > FreeAndNil (includelist);
> >
> > Etc
> >
> > Or
> >
> > If includelist <> nil then
> > FreeAndNil (includelist);
> >
> > They are not freed elsewhere are they.
> >
> > Peter Speden
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> -
> >     New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                   Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> > Web Archive at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> -
> >     New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                   Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> > Web Archive at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> -
> >     New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                   Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> > Web Archive at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> -
> >     New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >                   Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> > Web Archive at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>     New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                   Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/

Reply via email to