I have no other information than you but the way I
read the letter was.
We were running into time issues with D8, we had
completed the .Net portion of Octane but not the Win32 part so we decided not to
update it in this release so we could ship on time.
As an added bonus for Borland they can then use
updates to the Win32 as a reason to upgrade to D9. As most Developers are
still in the Win 32 world there seems very little incentive to go to D8.
We put off going to D7 because we didn't need Bold / net preview etc. As
we are supporting an existing win 32 app there seems no incentive to go to D8
either.
PS I am big into conspiracy theories.
|
- [DUG]: octane Tracey Maule
- Re: [DUG]: octane Robert martin
- Re: [DUG]: octane vss
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- RE: [DUG]: octane vss
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- Re: [DUG]: octane Tracey Maule
- Re: [DUG]: octane Robert martin
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- [DUG]: Octane and Software Assurance Laurence Bevan
- RE: [DUG]: Octane and Software A... Richard Vowles
- Re: [DUG]: octane Robert martin