Interestingly, this was the first email I sent and
although Richard has replied to it I have yet to receive it from the
list !
'Win32 is dead, time to bury it.' Is the attitude I would expect from someone who was
interested in a tool based on features / modern design etc. Not a Borland
rep. Perhaps I might spend the rest of the afternoon converting 700000 odd
lines of code to a new / relatively untested technology (with no noticeable
for our users). Tomorrow I will whip around the country and install the
NET runtime on all our users machines and upgrade the hardware and OS's for
those that cannot run it. By Wednesday I should be back working on adding
new functionality to our product (something that users are interested
in).
Product quality and functionality are what matters
to users, not what language the product was developed in. Moving to .NET
earns $0 revenue and costs $$$$$
|
- [DUG]: octane Tracey Maule
- Re: [DUG]: octane Robert martin
- Re: [DUG]: octane vss
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- RE: [DUG]: octane vss
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- Re: [DUG]: octane Tracey Maule
- RE: [DUG]: octane Robert martin
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- [DUG]: Octane and Software Assurance Laurence Bevan
- RE: [DUG]: Octane and Software A... Richard Vowles
- Re: [DUG]: octane Robert martin
- RE: [DUG]: octane C Fraser
- RE: [DUG]: octane Leigh Wanstead
- Re: [DUG]: octane Phil Scadden
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles
- RE: [DUG]: octane Phil Scadden
- RE: [DUG]: octane Richard Vowles