> That isn't actually incompatible with Wayne Williams comments - nobody has > suggested that one is being *done* before the other, only expressed dismay > at the intent to *deliver* one before the other.
Err, righto. As I said in my email, I wanted to make sure people understood the 64 bit project was not on hold. If everyone understood that already, my apologies. > If 64-bit were given a *higher* priority, and therefore more resources, it > could be delivered sooner, no? Yes, up to a point. That sort of thinking doesn't scale endlessly of course. Given we want to do both, and allowing for the dependencies both technical and in terms of team-member skills, this was the best option we came up with. We'll continue to take feedback and adjust, but right now this is the plan. Cheers Malcolm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: unsubscribe
