Wasn't at the launch(es), so no idea what went on, but I'd like to say that I welcome all your input here; your contributions (both here and on your blog) invariably seem helpful, lengthy and considered. I would like to make a respectful comment in Richard's direction that if his posts to this list weren't often so brief/single sentence and often only appearing when there is a Developers-Inc event/campaign upcoming, they might run less risk of getting misinterpreted as they seem to do at times. Kind regards, Conor
________________________________ From: delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] On Behalf Of Jolyon Smith Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 3:50 p.m. To: 'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List' Subject: Re: [DUG] Indy and Delphi 2010 - supplemental No I was not "a problem" at the Delphi launch. One pointed and tongue in cheek observation w.r.t the fact that the Project Options dialog does not itself make use of the much vaunted checkbox property editor for boolean's does not amount to "a problem" in my book. No, Richard for some reason chose to single me out as unfriendly and unhelpful specifically w.r.t my contribution to this list. It is fair to say that I have taken deep, DEEP offence at that, being among what I consider to be among the most strenuously helpful and polite (not to mention trying to straighten out misunderstandings between others who perhaps have not been so helpful or friendly - not naming names, but shall we just say that those choosing to reside in glass houses should not be so quick to throw stones). Suffice to say that any further software purchases that I personally make shall not contribute to any swelling of Developers-Inc coffers. I see no need to be helpful in THAT direction at all. It didn't help - although not directly connected - that presumably for some other reason Malcolm Groves neglected to mention that it was my comment on his blog that prompted him to have the conversation with Chris Bensen (to whom I'd already put the idea, via his blog) about directly supporting for Synaptics devices in the touch/gesturing engine in Delphi, preferring instead to give the impression that this was his - or Chris' - idea. From: delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] On Behalf Of Robert martin Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 3:11 p.m. To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List Subject: Re: [DUG] Indy and Delphi 2010 - supplemental Your best option is to join the Indy list group and post there. Remy (i think) is pretty active. I have not seen any posts about this problem so i think its likely something with your setup. Rob p.s. I take it you were a 'problem' at the Auckland Delphi launch? Jolyon Smith wrote: Having switched back to compiling against the version of Indy supplied with Delphi 2010 itself, this too does not build!! The IdCodeHeader unit references IdHeaderCoderBase unit... this does not exist in the Indy files supplied with Delphi (but *IS* present in the latest IndyTiburon.zip.... which I can't use for the reason in the previous post). HELP!? Am I just doing something dumb? >From your local, "unfriendly", "unhelpful" Delphi Advocate, Jolyon ________________________________ _______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: unsubscribe
_______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: unsubscribe
