If adding an "extra" prolog fixes it then I would ask if the prolog is
really there in the original xml to start with ?
Some XML viewers will add a default prolog when viewing xml that doesn't
contain any prolog. When viewing this xml in IE for example:
<root>
<child />
</root>
What IE actually shows is:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<root>
<child/>
</root>
I am sure I have seen similar behaviour in other xml viewers. I find this
an increasingly prevalent problem, with computer software trying to be too
"helpful"; especially irksome in data viewers that introduce artefacts in
the data being viewed that aren't actually present.
_______________________________________________
NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list
Post: [email protected]
Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with
Subject: unsubscribe
