Yip, its definitly there. I build the XML up, and I am checking it before it leaves so I know that at the point of calling the "Post" its definitly there. the one thing I havent done is run up wireshark.....this will tell me if its leaving my machine in tact I guess.
Jeremy On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jolyon Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > If adding an "extra" prolog fixes it then I would ask if the prolog is > really there in the original xml to start with ? > > Some XML viewers will add a default prolog when viewing xml that doesn't > contain any prolog. When viewing this xml in IE for example: > > <root> > <child /> > </root> > > What IE actually shows is: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > -<root> > <child/> > </root> > > I am sure I have seen similar behaviour in other xml viewers. I find this > an increasingly prevalent problem, with computer software trying to be too > "helpful"; especially irksome in data viewers that introduce artefacts in > the data being viewed that aren't actually present. > > _______________________________________________ > NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with > Subject: unsubscribe >
_______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: [email protected] Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with Subject: unsubscribe
