Neven commented: > You may be dismissive of MYOB but you can't argue with success
MYOB can't fill our niche in the market, and we can't fill their's. > You asked for my opinion of how I perceived Accredo and I > assume you agree with it, I don't agree that your > implementors couldn't handle something more complex, If that > is your logic its slightly patronising. I wanted to found out what you "disagreed" with in our product, and obviously it's everything apart from the UI. Your preception of Accredo of a product that does not meet your requirements is 100% correct, but why we should change our entire company, business, support and development model to achieve n-tier purity for your approval is somewhat beyond my understanding. We have a decades long relationship with our implementors and know very accurately what they are capable of, and what they are not. We talk to them often and in depth and have very close business relationships with some of them. From our perspective it is a losing proposition to develop anything that cannot be supported. > The point is if you want accredo be in the mid range with > Great Plains, Navision, MySAP etc then you will at minimum > offer the functionality I suggested, otherwise you are simply > posturing We have a jobs, products, customers, an existing market and development plans, and have been in the business for 20 plus years. What part of all this resembles posturing in any way? Apologies to the rest of the list for this discussion as it seems to have moved away from any interesting Delphi issues and into the realms of a disagreement about architecture and implementation. Unless any thing more Delphi specific is commented on I'll be keeping silent on this thread. Cheers, Max. _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
