> C#/2.0 is better. That is an unfortunate fact. By the time Delphi catches up > to 2.0 Visual Studio will probably be at Orcas and .NET 3.0 and believe me > some of the features of 3.0 are show stoppers for any IDE that isn't using
Delphi could compete with C++ for performance. C# is competing with Java. Its seems that get speed out of it you have to go to UNSAFE and then why arent you using C++? When Delphi started seeing itself as a competitor for VB rather C++, that's when rot set it. For me personally, I HATE C++. I'm rotten at it and takes forever to find all the bugs. On other hand, what I write is often performance-sensitive and trying to escape from Fortran. Delphi is an alternative but somewhat platform limited. Would be great as someone said if could get OSX/Windows/Unix capability. In past crossplatform has been hampered with the ideal of cross-platform GUI. Now this is a worthwhile holy grail I agree. However, access to native libraries and platform-compiling only is a great first step. ---------------------------------------------------------- Phil Scadden, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences 764 Cumberland St, Private Bag 1930, Dunedin, New Zealand Ph +64 3 4799663, fax +64 3 477 5232 _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
