> A small software house will consider a good design a compact tight > design that prohibits bugs, and makes good software, even though the > learning curve is huge.
Yes, though I'm not all that happy with big learning curves. And "Makes good software" is a rather important criterion. There's no end of crap that can be churned out in the name of good design, with tools tailored for that objective. Why is why I become amused when I hear people praising Bold, for example. Beautiful designs. Useless performance in real-life applications. So please don't mention Bold too often if you want to lure me towards ECO, Richard <G>. cheers, peter _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
