+1

Regards,
Jakob

2011/12/18 Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>:
> +0: agree on the conventions, but I believe that we should expand with 
> provisions about import structure:
>
> a) provision of 'no unused imports'
> b) provisions on import ordering e.g requesting something like:
>
> import statics;
>
> import java....;
>
> import javax......;
>
> import others;
>
> import org.deltaspike;
>
> Note that actual structure would be TBD, this is just a suggestion. The 
> benefit to have a well-established import structure is that it further 
> minimizes diffs introduced by various ways of adding imports (autocomplete, 
> auto-import, manual, etc).
>
> On 2011-12-17, at 7:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I asked [1] to add alternative settings to DELTASPIKE-12, since we have
>> seen several different opinions (about details).
>> Nobody added an alternative set. So I start the formal vote with the
>> suggested set right now.
>> If we don't see a majority, we have to re-visit this topic again (+ we
>> would need a new vote with at least one concrete alternative).
>>
>> Please review the coding conventions at [2] and vote.
>> (Its content is also included below for your convenience).
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 I'm ok with the coding conventions
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 I've major objections, because...
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gerhard
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Ga8
>> [2] http://s.apache.org/SAj
>>
>> ---
>>
>> 1) no tabs, only spaces (4 spaces).
>> 2) bracelets on new line
>> 3) force bracelets
>> 4) 4 spaces indent size
>> 5) a space between keyword and round bracket
>> 6) a space before and after an operand
>> 7) line width: 120
>> 8) no underscore at the beginning
>> 9) no wildcard imports
>



-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at

Reply via email to