+1 for ExpressionActivated which seems closer to a name the CDI spec would use.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected] > wrote: > hi, > > please send your opinion about the name (@ActivatedOnExpression vs > @ExpressionActivated). > > thx & regards, > gerhard > > > > 2011/12/20 Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> > > > +1 > > > > 2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>: > > > +1 > > > > > > On 2011-12-19, at 8:28 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > > > >> hi @ all, > > >> > > >> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. > > >> > > >> [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. > > >> > > >> the basic concept: > > >> via the annotation @ExpressionActivated it's possible to veto bean > > >> implementations based on the given expression. > > >> it's possible to change the supported syntax via an optional > > >> ExpressionInterpreter. > > >> > > >> please send > > >> +1, +0 or -1 because... > > >> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. > > >> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [3] > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> gerhard > > >> > > >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp > > >> [2] > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Usage#CoreUsage-@ExpressionActivated > > >> [3] > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Christian Kaltepoth > > Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > > >
