I would prefer @activatedonexpression, it fits better with the spec. As an alternative, what about @ActivatedByExpression which to me reads better.
-- Pete Muir http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete On 2 Jan 2012, at 05:34, Jason Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for @ActivatedOnExpression. It reads better which goes a long way for easy > to use, self documenting code. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 1, 2012, at 17:57, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hi, >> >> please send your opinion about the name (@ActivatedOnExpression vs >> @ExpressionActivated). >> >> thx & regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2011/12/20 Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> 2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On 2011-12-19, at 8:28 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: >>>> >>>>> hi @ all, >>>>> >>>>> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. >>>>> >>>>> [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. >>>>> >>>>> the basic concept: >>>>> via the annotation @ExpressionActivated it's possible to veto bean >>>>> implementations based on the given expression. >>>>> it's possible to change the supported syntax via an optional >>>>> ExpressionInterpreter. >>>>> >>>>> please send >>>>> +1, +0 or -1 because... >>>>> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. >>>>> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [3] >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> gerhard >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp >>>>> [2] >>>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Usage#CoreUsage-@ExpressionActivated >>>>> [3] >>>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Kaltepoth >>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal >>>
