Yes, that's what I feared. Do JBossAS7.1 out of the box has the SM enabled?
If not we shall setup a CI job with such a situation. LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:15 AM >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? > >Java EE 7 will mandate that a Java EE implementation must be able to run under >a SM. It makes sense to test DS under a SM as well, IMO, as some people want >it… > >I think you can surround stuff in a "if SM enabled" block? > >On 11 Jun 2012, at 08:53, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Do we like to be fully SecurityManager aware? SecurityManagers are always a >> big performance hog, but when looking at all the (imo weird) EE7 'cloud' >> proposals, I have the strong feeling that most functions will be based on >> excessive SecurityManager usage... >> How can we test this best? >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> > > > >
