Txs, I've now created a Jira task for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193
Who likes to do this? LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:38 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? > > No, and there is no requirement being added to enable the SM out of the box > (thankfully!). > > On 12 Jun 2012, at 10:36, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Yes, that's what I feared. Do JBossAS7.1 out of the box has the SM > enabled? >> >> >> If not we shall setup a CI job with such a situation. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:15 AM >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? >>> >>> Java EE 7 will mandate that a Java EE implementation must be able to > run under a SM. It makes sense to test DS under a SM as well, IMO, as some > people want it… >>> >>> I think you can surround stuff in a "if SM enabled" block? >>> >>> On 11 Jun 2012, at 08:53, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Do we like to be fully SecurityManager aware? SecurityManagers are > always a big performance hog, but when looking at all the (imo weird) EE7 > 'cloud' proposals, I have the strong feeling that most functions will be > based on excessive SecurityManager usage... >>>> How can we test this best? >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
