+1

- Romain


2012/6/26 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> @ pete:
> +1
>
> @ java-se vs java-ee features:
>
> we can think about a more fine-grained structure (similar to seam3).
> e.g.:
> deltaspike-jpa-transaction
> deltaspike-jpa-query
> ...
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2012/6/25 Pete Muir <[email protected]>
>
> > Well, we were looking for some good use cases for the ServiceHandler.
> >
> > I would be in support of adding it to DS core, now we have a strong use
> > case.
> >
> > Property util should not be controversial. Maybe we can improve it's API
> > whilst we are at it :-)
> >
> > On 25 Jun 2012, at 10:25, Thomas Hug wrote:
> >
> > > Eventually this came in a little early, but it's already on the radar:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-60
> > >
> > > The current implementation mainly depends on the Solder ServiceHandler
> > (as far as I remember not yet in DS, waiting for CDI 1.1) and the
> Property
> > utils.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > Von: Mark Struberg [[email protected]]
> > > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juni 2012 14:21
> > > An: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: Re: cdi-query
> > >
> > > +1 great stuff to review and add them!
> > >
> > > That would fit great into the deltaspike-jpa module, wdyt?
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: Pete Muir <[email protected]>
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Cc:
> > >> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:53 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: cdi-query
> > >>
> > >> IMO this would be a great thing to add!
> > >>
> > >> On 24 Jun 2012, at 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> just browsed
> > http://ctpconsulting.github.com/query/1.0.0.Alpha4/index.html
> > >> and
> > >>> it is really amazing (a spring-data CDI oriented).
> > >>>
> > >>> it is currently based on solder but since DS integrates a lot of this
> > stuff
> > >>> i wonder if it could be integrated in DS in a really portable way?
> > >>>
> > >>> - Romain
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to