+0 since i'm not sure XML is really CDI spirit...and it needs to be
consistent with already existing config (global alternatives etc) which can
be a bit complicated

- Romain


2012/7/6 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> i'm not sure if we should start with it for v0.4, however, if it gets an
> own (optional) module: +0
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2012/7/6 Jason Porter <[email protected]>
>
> > It's been a 10 on our list for awhile but we haven't done it yet.
> Thoughts
> > on adding it to v0.4? It would be a straight port from what we have in
> Seam
> > 3 with package name changes. It's currently the only implementation in
> > existence (that we know of) of the older xml config that was to be part
> of
> > spec but was later pulled.
> >
> > --
> > Jason Porter
> > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
> >
> > Software Engineer
> > Open Source Advocate
> > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
> >
> > PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> >
>

Reply via email to