Hmm just another idea: If we do an own config module, we could provide the core + different bindings:
1. the 'old' CDI spec XML config 2. a Spring style XML config 3. ... LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Friday, July 6, 2012 10:14 PM > Subject: Re: v0.4-incubating adding Seam Config (xml config) > > +0 since i'm not sure XML is really CDI spirit...and it needs to be > consistent with already existing config (global alternatives etc) which can > be a bit complicated > > - Romain > > > 2012/7/6 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >> i'm not sure if we should start with it for v0.4, however, if it gets > an >> own (optional) module: +0 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2012/7/6 Jason Porter <[email protected]> >> >> > It's been a 10 on our list for awhile but we haven't done it > yet. >> Thoughts >> > on adding it to v0.4? It would be a straight port from what we have in >> Seam >> > 3 with package name changes. It's currently the only > implementation in >> > existence (that we know of) of the older xml config that was to be > part >> of >> > spec but was later pulled. >> > >> > -- >> > Jason Porter >> > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >> > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >> > >> > Software Engineer >> > Open Source Advocate >> > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling >> > >> > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >> > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >> > >> >
